🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a major setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for additional review if he has objections.

President Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries